From: rrich » Wed, 17 May 2006 20:52 [message #36244]
FWIW, i noticed a marked increase in SPAM after disabling SORBS. For us, since we never did notice a false positive (note 'notice') from SORBS, we went back to enabling it and things have been better.
- rrich
-
Messages: 9-
-
|
From: DSARick » Thu, 18 May 2006 17:04 [message #36262]
What about rhsbl.sorbs.net? Is keeping this enabled causing similar issues?
- DSARick
-
Messages: 46-
-
|
From: Mbetel » Sat, 03 June 2006 12:39 [message #36667]
Is anyone actively pushing to get this resolved? I need to implement on an FC5 box and this is keeping us from buying and implementing Kerio...
Michiel
- Mbetel
-
Messages: 1-
-
|
From: Kerio_pdobry » Sat, 03 June 2006 16:49 [message #36669]
| Mbetel wrote on Sat, 03 June 2006 12:39 |
Is anyone actively pushing to get this resolved? I need to implement on an FC5 box and this is keeping us from buying and implementing Kerio...
Michiel
|
Well, personally, I would not use FC5 since it have bugs similar to this one. In fact, it is not reliable if almost any application can crash due to bug in system libraries. It would be better to use well-proven FC4 and wait for FC5 update.
- Kerio_pdobry
-
Messages: 2329-
-
|
|
|
From: Dusha » Wed, 07 June 2006 21:11 [message #36773]
All, fyi,
I'd performed a test today regarding this FC5 bug that affects Webmail.
I've downloaded compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.fc4.i386.rpm package from FC4 distibution, and manually replaced /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5.0.7 on FC5 system with a older one from FC4 rpm.
Now everything is fine :)
I understand that this cannot be treated as a permanent way out, but those of you who are runing FC5 already may consider that as a temporary workaround untill RH will release updated compat-libstdc++-33 for FC5.
- Dusha
-
Messages: 4-
-
|
From: Kerio_jthomas » Wed, 07 June 2006 22:21 [message #36776]
Hey, thanks for the info. 
However, we will have to consider this "unsupported" until we have an offical fix from RedHat. So if you go this route, you'll have to fix your own problems if they develop.
Cheers,
Joshua
Joshua Thomas
Technical Support Manager
2350 Mission College Blvd, Suite 400
Santa Clara, CA 95054
Phone: (408) 496-4500
Fax: (408) 496-6902
http://www.kerio.com/support.html
- Kerio_jthomas
-
Messages: 587-
-
|
From: Biohazard » Fri, 14 July 2006 16:04 [message #37559]
Can you tel me hou you did change this lib? i'm stil not being a star at my linux configurations
Thanks,
- Biohazard
-
Messages: 3-
-
|
From: Dusha » Fri, 14 July 2006 16:12 [message #37560]
| Biohazard wrote on Fri, 14 July 2006 18:04 |
Can you tel me hou you did change this lib? i'm stil not being a star at my linux configurations
Thanks,
|
1. You have to download compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.fc4.i386.rpm package from FC4 distibution
2. You have to unpack the library libstdc++.so.5.0.7 from the downloaded RPM (you can use Midnight Commander "mc" to browse the contents of RPM)
3. You have to overwrite the file "/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5.0.7" with the one from FC4 package (under root permissions).
P.S. I'm not taking any responsibility for the stability of the system after that operation, however, I didn't noticed any issues on my own FC5.
- Dusha
-
Messages: 4-
-
|
From: easiconseil » Sat, 15 July 2006 22:07 [message #37576]
Does the lib bug concern Fedora Core 6 test 1 too ?
--
MaT
Courriel : mat<_at_>pnymail.com
--------------------------------
- easiconseil
-
Messages: 144-
-
|
From: Biohazard » Fri, 21 July 2006 11:34 [message #37748]
Thanks for the swift reaction, and of course it's my own responsibility if i mess up. (isn't it alway's.... :o) )
John
- Biohazard
-
Messages: 3-
-
|
From: Kerio_pdobry » Thu, 24 August 2006 15:10 [message #38452]
According to RedHat developers, this bug is fixed in current builds of FC6 beta. Update for Fedora Core 5 would be released in few weeks.
- Kerio_pdobry
-
Messages: 2329-
-
|
From: Dusha » Sat, 30 September 2006 21:48 [message #39393]
| Kerio_pdobry wrote on Thu, 24 August 2006 17:10 |
According to RedHat developers, this bug is fixed in current builds of FC6 beta. Update for Fedora Core 5 would be released in few weeks.
|
I have checked bugzilla today and there is an update posted with a link to the test update packages : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2006-Septem ber/msg00450.html
I have tested them today and they looks fine in respect to the Kerio Mailserver Webmail crash issue.
However, this update is still not officially posted for some reason...[Updated on: Sat, 30 September 2006 22:05]
- Dusha
-
Messages: 4-
-
|
From: Dusha » Sat, 07 October 2006 23:12 [message #39532]
Finally, Updated compat packages are released!
From this point, FC5 can be treated as Supported.
http://fedoranews.org/cms/node/1669
* Mon Sep 18 2006 Jakub Jelinek 3.2.3-56.fc5
- rebuild against never glibc-headers to fix btowc (#186410)
- in 64-bit builds remove 32-bit /usr/lib/lib* libraries from the
buildroots (and similarly on 32-bit builds remove 64-bit /usr/lib64/lib*)
before AutoReq generation
- on ppc*/s390* make sure all needed math *l stubs are included
- Dusha
-
Messages: 4-
-
|
From: freakinvibe » Wed, 18 October 2006 09:34 [message #39722]
As SORBS say themselves, in their DNSBL list the include dynamic address spaces, so it possible that someone who runs a mail server on a dynamic IP address gets listed.
Or a static IP address that has a pointer record like
232-243-11-34.myisp.com
is also listed. Your ISP should add "static" to your PTR records, then you are fine, example:
232-243-11-34.static.myisp.com
I would recommend (as Kerio does) to just increase the score by 3. Works great for me.
Regards, Pascal
- freakinvibe
-
Messages: 807-
-
|
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
