Connect. Communicate. Collaborate. Securely.

Home » Kerio User Forums » Kerio Connect » Login without <_at_>
  •  
pwhodges

Messages: 144
Karma: 0
Send a private message to this user
Is there an alternative that we can use for clients which don't like <_at_> in the login name?

Paul
  •  
Kerio_jthomas

Messages: 511
Karma: 1
Send a private message to this user
Which client is this?

Joshua Thomas
Technical Support Manager
2350 Mission College Blvd, Suite 400
Santa Clara, CA 95054
Phone: (408) 496-4500
Fax: (408) 496-6902
http://www.kerio.com/support.html

  •  
pwhodges

Messages: 144
Karma: 0
Send a private message to this user
Don't worry - it turned out not to be the issue (and I don't yet know what client - it's on an old Macintosh). As far as I can tell the login failure was because the NTLM authentication option was enabled on the Advanced Options / Security Policy tab (by default - I didn't do it, honest) even though I don't use it. The client must have had some way to detect that, because when I disabled it, the login started working.

Paul
Previous Topic: Exporting mailing lists
Next Topic: Message Queue Question
Goto Forum:
  


Disclaimer:
Kerio discussion forums are intended for open communication between forum members and may contain information and material posted by members which may be useful in learning about Kerio products. The discussion forums are not intended to provide technical support for any specific product. Any information implied or expressed in the discussion forums is that of the posting member. Kerio is in no way responsible for the information posted in the forums, or its accuracy. Kerio employees may participate in the discussions, but their postings do not represent an offical position of the company on any issues raised or discussed. Kerio reserves the right to monitor and maintain the forums to promote free and accurate exchange of information.

Current Time: Mon Nov 20 10:34:54 CET 2017

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00431 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.
Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.4.