Colleagues, Kind time of day!
Who can give me please advice?
I search (and I test) analyzers of broad gullies for KWF (tried already WRSPY, IAM, Proxy inspector).
As them to adjust so that they correctly considered my traffic. Feature at my KWF that is used non-transparent proxy.
If I analyze only connection.log the general size of traffic practically comes nearer to that, that specifies KWF, but if “see” on users the most part of traffic to lay down on the machine with KWF since on it works proxy. On users there is a traffic which gives NAT (icq, smtp, pop3, ftp, etc.).
If I analyze purely http.log naturally I see only http traffic, traffic on NAT is not present.
If I analyze both of a broad gully simultaneously there is a significant excess of traffic by that shows KWF.
I do so: I analyze both of a broad gully, completely I consider traffic from http.log, and on connection.log I put the filter (to not consider traffic http proxy, i.e. that was on behalf of proxy since it on idea should undertake from http.log), i.e. I take from it everything, what not http. Then on users I put. Also DOES NOT CONVERGE! KWF shows more, than the analyzer of broad gullies. On relative size it somewhere 17-22 % a day.
What do I do not so? In what my mistake?
Kerio discussion forums are intended for open communication between forum
members and may contain information and material posted by members which may
be useful in learning about Kerio products. The discussion forums are not
intended to provide technical support for any specific product. Any
information implied or expressed in the discussion forums is that of the
posting member. Kerio is in no way responsible for the information posted in
the forums, or its accuracy. Kerio employees may participate in the
discussions, but their postings do not represent an offical position of the
company on any issues raised or discussed. Kerio reserves the right to
monitor and maintain the forums to promote free and accurate exchange of